I suppose the foursome idea was to circumvent one or the other getting the desired threesome and then canceling any further such adventures before the complementary engagement. She is not being pushy about inviting another guy like he is being pushy about inviting another woman, it sounds like she'd be happy with twosomes. Because I think it's more likely he'd dump her after he gets his instead of trading. If he can reassure her mixed feelings about threesomes, and can have a successful threesome with another guy, she should act in good faith and return the favor. Are either of them interested in a 4some? And what about her mixed feelings? My advice would be to take turns. I don't see much difference between firing someone for being black, for being gay (and sexual), or for being a sexual woman. I think it's mostly women who are fired from teaching because they have sex with other adults, but I'm sure that even straight men suffer from this precedent too.
Why do they always involve exposing a woman to his shit? No, your shit doesn't smell like roses, and the other guys laughing are insecure rejects too.
It was heartwarming to hear a man speak out about this young misogynist practice of naming the most gross or painful ways to hurt a woman sexually.
